There is Tuesday 200 Hours of Community Service and a Suspended Prison Sentence of Four Months Demanded Against Karim Aachboun, WHO IS SUSPECTED or Blackmailing Johnny de Mol. Aachboun is the Legal Advisor of the Mol’s ex-Fianancee Shima Kaes. He is also suspended of Damaging The Reputation of Lawyer Sébas Diekstra.
Aachboun, Who Did Not Appear in Court in Amsterdam on Tuesday, had Sent a Letter on Behalf of Kaes to the Presenter and his Parents John de Mol and Willeke Alberti. The Utrecht Native States That It was A Settlement Request, But The de Mol Family Saw It Differently.
The Public Prosecution Service (OM) Called the Letter “A Classic Attempt at Blackmail” in Court in Amsterdam on Tuesday. Aachboun Could Have Worded A Request for Settlement Differently With His Legal Background. “If Kaes had Suffered Damage, that should have bone menttioned, along with the mention of an amount of compensation.”
Accordance to the public prosecution service, Aachboun’s Choice of Words in the letter Was Deliberately Sneaky So That He Could Deny Blackmail. The letter Excluded, Among Other Things, The Intervention of Lawyers.
The Public Prosecution Service Holds Aachboun Accountable for Drawing Up the Letter As A Legal Advisor. “That comes with extra response,” Said the Public Prosecutor. “He acted indently and dishonestly.”
The Mol’s Lawyer Peter Plasman had Already Announced Earlier in the day that his client does not need compensation. However, he hopes for “a half -suspended sentence”.
Diekstra’s Reputation Damaged by Aachboun
The Judge Directly Handled A Second Case Against Aachboun on Tuesday. This was Brought by Lawyer Diekstra, Who PreviOutly Worked at Defense. Aachboun had accused Diekstra or Groping the Breasts of a Female Colleague Turning his Time at Defense.
Aachboun Assisted the Woman, who had reported the incident to the police, but accordance to the ad retracted the accusation duration an interrogation. Diekstra Filed A Report of Defamation and SLANDER Against Aachboun.
Accordance to the Public Prosecution Service, Diekstra’s Honor and Name Have Been Affected. “The fact that he works as a victim’s lawyer, and in that capacity assists victims of sexual abuse, makes the infringement on his integrity greater and thereby damages his reputation.”
Aachboun had, Among Other Things, Accused Diekstra on Social Media and Called on his Followers to Share the Messages for the Widest Possible Reach. Accordance to the public prosecution service, that cannot be explained as defending his client. He also did not first give Diekstra the opportunity to respond to the accusations “His goal was to blacken diekstra.”
Aachboun Did Not Appear at Hearings
The Public Prosecution Service Tok Into Account in The Sentence Demand That Aachboun HAS Not PreviOutly Come Into Contact With The Police And The Judiciary. However, it counts that the suspect, who did not appear at the substantive hearing twice, did not take responsibility.
Ad Aerts, A Colleague of Aachboun who Co-Signed the Letter To The Mol Family, is also Being Prosecuted. His case will be deal with substantial at a later date.