Despite his conviction of up to six years in prison for several crimes, an Amsterdam robber is not yet detained. He could not be arrested by miscommunication within the Public Prosecution Service. The OM is investigating whether the error is the result of the hack.
The 23-year-old Yakub S. was sentenced to six years in prison on 19 August for a thud in a jeweler, a violent robbery on another jeweler and two burglaries in Amsterdam. But he is not yet detained because of miscommunication within the Public Prosecution Service (OM) during his pre -trial detention, a spokesperson for the OM confirms after earlier reporting from Het Parool .
S. was stuck in custody until July in The Hague prior to the court case, where he is suspected of another thud. But on July 17, the Hague court suspended the custody in that investigation. The OM in Amsterdam should have taken the man in custody, but that did not happen due to miscommunication.
Possibly that is the result of the computer hack at the OM in July. The Public Prosecution Service in Amsterdam may not have reached the message about the release of S. in The Hague, because the computer system had failed. The OM is investigating whether that was the result of the computer hack.
As a result, both the OM and the Court of S. had not fixed for the handling of the criminal case in Amsterdam on 5 August. Because the pre -trial detention was suspended, S. could not be fixed after the ruling on August 19.
The OM hopes to be able to fix S. next week. That decision must be taken during a hearing of the appeal on the thud in The Hague, says a spokesperson for the OM.
An Amsterdam Robber is not Yet in Custody Despite Being Sentenced to Six Years in Prison for Multiple Offenses. Due to miscommunication within the public prosecution service, he could not be arrested. The Public Prosecution Service is Investigating Whether the Error is the Result of the Hack.
23-year-old Yakub S. was sentenced on August 19 to Six Years in Prison for a Ram Raid at a Jeweler, A Violent Robbery at Another Jeweler and Two Burglaries in Amsterdam. But he is not yet in custody due to miscommunication within the public prosecution service (OM) Dois pre-trial detention, a spokesperson for the public prosecution service confirms after Earlier reports from Het Parool .
S. was in pre-trial detention in The Hague Until July, prior to the trial, where he is suspended of another ram raid. But On July 17, The Hague Court Suspended Pre-Trial Detention in That Investigation. The Public Prosecution Service in Amsterdam Should then Taken The Man Into Pre-Trial Detention, But this Did Not Happen Due to Miscommunication.
This may be the result of the computer hack at the public prosecution service in July. The Message About S.’s Release in the Hague May not Have Reached the Public Prosecution Service in Amsterdam because the computer System had failed. The Public Prosecution Service is Investigating Whether was the result of the computer hack.
As a result, neith the public prosecution service nor the court had detained S. for the hearing of the criminal case in Amsterdam on August 5. because the pre-trial detention had suspended Been, S. Could also not be detained after the verdict on August 19.
The Public Prosecution Service Hopes to Be Able to Detain S. Next Week. That decision must be tasks. Taken a Hearing of the Appeal Regarding the Ram Raid in the Hague, Says a Spokesperson for the Public Prosecution Service.