Hello and Welcome to this live blog! Here we will keep you informed of the parliamentary debate about the riots in The Hague last Saturday.
Room debates about riots in The Hague
7 minutes ago
Ouwehand: ‘Van der Plas participates in the Ophiterij by lying’ BBB leader Van der Plas speaks out against the violence, but immediately says the concerns of people about the lack of homes and the number of asylum seekers who come to the Netherlands.
According to Ouwehand (PvdD), Van der Plas has to look at himself. Her party “lied” against the farmers about the nitrogen problem. “Not surprising that they get angry.” Van der Plas is indignant. “I’m not going to participate anymore, but I’m going to answer this,” she says. “Someone chooses to grab a stone and set fire to a police car. Those are individual choices.”
Ouwehand quotes Auschwitz survivor Primo Levi: “It happened and it can happen again,” said the Jewish-Italian writer. “People can be excited and walk behind Charlatans,” warns Ouwehand. “Van der Plas participates in the Ophiterij by lying.”
Van der Plas strongly denies that she is also responsible for the violence. She calls that accusation “link”.
16 minutes ago
NSC and DENK cannot find each other in debate about polarization NSC leader Eddy van Hijum comes to the fore to ask Van Baarle for reflection. It is a broader question “how we deal with each other”, says Van Hijum, who asks the think leader to reflect on it himself. For example when it comes to his statement to the former NSC-Buitenlandminister Caspar Veldkamp. But also in the debate that is being conducted, the dichotomy in the room becomes clear again.
Because what follows is that Van Baarle van Hijum points out that it was NSC who went into a cabinet with the PVV and the ministers criticized by DEND. “If there is one normalizer of the extreme right, then it is the NSC group!” Van Hijum repeats that all parties in the Chamber have to reflect, but according to Van Baarle, NSC has no right to point out polarization.
24 minutes ago
Think announces the motion of no confidence against Justice Minister Van Oosten DENK-Leader Van Baarle may be the first to speak to the debate. “After eighty years, fascists were opened through our streets again,” he begins. “They chanted ‘Sieg Heil’ and did the Hitler salute.”
Van Baarle focuses his dissatisfaction on Justice Minister Van Oosten. “He was not even willing to call a Nazi, a Nazi,” says Van Baarle. The VVD minister initially did not want to say this week which corner the violence of Saturday came to the Malieveld. He came back to that later. Terror fighter NCTV had just advised to state that it was the extreme right -wing violence.
Van Baarle knows enough despite the turn of Van Oosten. “Then you are unsuitable as Minister of Justice.” He already announces a motion of no confidence. The PVV of Wilders is also jointly responsible here according to the think leader. “The seeds are being planted. Here in the room. By Wilders.”
1 hour ago
Pamphlet against violence not signed by left -wing parties parties disagree about a joint statement to condemn the extreme right -wing violence. Left -wing parties do not want to be with right -wing parties such as FVD and PVV under the pamphlet of the ChristenUnie.
“The violence on the Malieveld is unacceptable,” heads the pamphlet. “We convince the right-wing extremist violence,” is further down the text.
GroenLinks-PvdA, D66, SP, Party for the Animals and DENK call it unbelievable that FVD and PVV are also under the statement. Member of Parliament Jan Paternotte of D66 believes that in this way conspiracy theories of Gideon van Meijeren (FVD) that the extreme left antifa and the police would have provoked the violence, are laundered. Earlier statements from PVV leader Geert Wilders about not accepting democratic decisions are a reason not to sign.
GroenLinks-PvdA joins the words of Paternotte and calls it unbelievable. “After years of incorporating and setting up groups of people, it is not enough to condemn the extreme right -wing political violence. Then the distribution of ideas that lead to violence must be stopped.”
1 hour ago
For PvdD trust in the air is the news that the minister did not initially follow the advice of the NCTV, causes annoyance to several parties.
“The question of trust is on the table,” said PvdD leader Esther Ouwehand yesterday on X. DENK-foreman Stephan van Baarle finds it “unsuitable and the position of Minister unworthy” if you “willingly and know about Nazis and extreme right rig”.
If a motion of no confidence follows, then the chance is still small that it will get a majority.
1 hour ago
NCTV had advised riots immediately as ‘extreme right’ to label the initially cautious Minister of Oosten had received advice from the NCTV not only to “racer, rig or hooligans, without naming the underlying right-wing extremist ideas”.
Otherwise, no “complete picture of reality” would be sketched and right-wing extremist ideas would not be protected as a result, “but even further normalized”, it can be read in the advice published on Wednesday evening.
1 hour ago
Furious reactions in politics, but also mutual annoyance politicians react with horror at the events in The Hague. Outgoing Prime Minister Dick Schoof called the riots “performs unacceptable” and similar sounds also came from other politicians. But D66 leader Rob Jetten and GL-PVDA leader Frans Timmermans also pointed out that they think that the politics that are incurred also has a role in this, and in particular their colleague Geert Wilders.
According to Jetten, the rioters used slogans from Wilders. “Then it is up to all democratic forces to say: we will not pick this,” says Jetten. He also spoke of “political violence”, partly due to the extreme right -wing expressions and Nazi symbolism that could be seen during the demonstration.
Minister Eelco Heinen (Finance) said that the events should not be made politically as far as he is concerned. Responsible Minister Foort van Oosten (Justice) was also very cautious in the first instance, to the annoyance of the opposition parties in the Chamber. Later Van Oosten returned to his words: he found himself “too star” and still spoke of “extreme right -wing rioters”.
2 hours ago
Asylum demonstration in Malieveld escalates, Window office D66 smashed in
2 hours ago
What happened in The Hague? On the Malieveld in The Hague, around 3,500 people came together on Saturday to protest against the asylum policy, an initiative of the 26-year-old ‘Els Right’. But soon after the start of the demonstration, the atmosphere turns: a group of about 1,500 people occupies the A12, after which it also gets out of hand on the Malieveld itself. The rioters attack the police and the press, and then put in the city center of The Hague to address destruction to, among others, the party office of D66 and is an attempt to enter the Binnenhof.
Dozens of people were arrested. As far as we know, four agents and seven journalists (slightly) were injured, as well as a catering employee who mediated between a customer and A Rioter.
Hello and Welcome to this Live Blog! Here we will keep you informed of the house debate on the riots in the Hague Last Saturday.
House Debates Riots in the Hague
7 minutes ago
Ouwehand: ‘Van der Plas is participating in the incitement by Lyping’ BBB Leader van der Plas Speaks Out Against the Violence, But Immediately Goes On To Say That She Understands People’s Concerns about the Lack of Housing and the Number of Asylum.
Accordance to Ouwehand (PvdD), Van der Plas Should Mainly Look at Herself. Her party “song” to the farmers about the nitrogen problem. “No wonder they get angry.” Van der Plas is Indignant. “I’m not going to participate in this anymore, but I am going to answar it,” She says. “Someone Chooses to Pick Up A Stone and Set A Police Car on Fire. Those Are Individual Choices.”
Ouwehand quotes Auschwitz Survivor Primo Levi: “It happened and it can happen again,” Said the Jewish-Italian Writer. “People can be incited and follow charlatans,” Ouwehand Warns. “Van der Plas is participating in the incitement by Lying.”
Van der Plas Vehemently Denies That She is also Responsible for the Violence. She Calls That Accusation “Linked.”
16 minutes ago
NSC and think Cannot Find Each Other in Debate About Polariazation NSC Leader Eddy Van Hijum Comes Forward to Ask from Baarle for Reflection. It is a Broader Question of “How We Deal with Each Other,” Van Hijum Believes, Who Asks The DEND LEADER TO REFLECT ON THIS HIMELF. For Example, When it comes to his statement to the Former NSC Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp. But also in the debate that follows, The Division in the House Becomes Clear Again.
Because What Follows is that of Baarle Points Out To Hijum That It was the NSC that Went Into A Cabinet with the PVV and the Ministers Heavily Criticized by DENK. “If there is one normalizer of the extreme right, it is the nsc faction!” Van Hijum repeats that all parties in the house must reflect, but accordance to from Baarle, NSC Has No Right to Point to Polariazation.
24 minutes ago
Think Announces Motion of No Confidence Against Minister of Justice van Oosten Think Leader of Baarle Can Speak First as the Applicant of the Debate. “After Eighty years, fascists were openly walking through our streets again,” he’s in. “They chanted ‘sieg Heil’ and Did the Hitler Salute.”
Van Baarle Directs His Displeasure at Minister of Justice van Oosten. “He was not equally willing to call a Nazi, A Nazi,” Says van Baarle. The VVD Minister Initial Did Not Want to say this week from which corner the violence of Saturday on the Malieveld Came. Hey later retracted this. Terrorism expert NCTV had advised to mention that it was far-right violence.
Van Baarle Knows Enough Despite van Oosten’s turn. “Then you are unsuitable as Minister of Justice.” He already announces a motion of no confidence. The PVV of Wilders is also Jointly Responsible Here Accordination to the DEND LEADER. “The Seeds are planted. Here in the chamber. By Wilders.”
1 hour ago
Pamphlet Against Violence Not Signed by Left-Wing Parties Parties Do Not Agree on a Joint Statement To Condemn Far-Right Violence. Left-wing Parties do not because to be under the pamphlet of the ChristenUnie with right-wing parties Such as fvd and PVV.
“The Violence on the Malieveld is unacceptable,” The Pamphlet Reads. “We Strongly Condemn Far-Right Extremist Violence,” The Text Continues.
GroenLinks-PvdA, D66, SP, Party for the Animals and think call it unbelievable that fvd and PVV are also under the statement. Member of Parliament Jan Paternotte of D66 Believes That Way Conspiracy Theories of Gideon van Meijeren (FvD) That the Far-Left Antifa and the Police would have provoked the violence are whitewashed. Previous Statements by PVV Leader Geert Wilders About Not Acceptance Democratic Decisions are also a reason not to sign.
GroenLinks-Pvda Joins Paternotte’s Words and calls it unbelievable. “After years of inciting and setting up Groups of People, it is not enough to condemn far-right political political violence. Then the spreading of the ideas that lead to the violence must be stopped.”
1 hour ago
For PvdD, A Question of Confidence is in the Air the News that the minister initially Did not Follow the Advice of the NCTV is causing annoyance to several parties.
“Question of Confidence is on the table,” Said PvdD Leader Esther Ouwehand on X. Think Leader Stephan Van Baarle Thinks It is “Unsuitable and Unworthy of the Position of Minister” If You “Knowingly and Willingly Remain Silent Nazis and Far-Rightt.”
If a motion of no confidence follows, the chans is still small that it will get a majority.
1 hour ago
NCTV had advised to immediatly label Riots as ‘Far-Right’ the initial Cautious Minister of Oosten had Received Advice from the NCTV not only to speak of “Rioters, Thugs or Hooligans, Without Mentioning the Underlying Far-Right Ideas.”
Otherwise, no “complete picture of reality” would be sketched and far-right extremist ideas to would be not be problematized, “but even further normalized,” accordance to the advice published on Wednesday Evening.
1 hour ago
Furious Reactions in Politics, But also Mutual Annoyance Politicians React with horror to the events in the Hague. Outgoing Prime Minister Dick Sheaf Called the Riots “Completely Unacceptable” and Similar Sounds also Came From Other Politicians. But D66 Leader Rob Jetten and GL-PVDA LEADER Frans Timmermans also Pointed Out That the According to Them Inciting Politics also plays a Role in this, and in particular Their Colleague Geert Wilders.
Accordance to Jetten, The Rioters Used Slogans of Wilders. “Then it is up to all democratic forces to say: we will not tolerate this,” Said Jetten. Hey also spoke of “political violence”, partly due to the far-right expressions and nazi symbolism that were seen king the demonstration.
Minister Eelco Heinen (finance) then said that as far as he was group, The Events Should Not Be Made Political. Responsible Minister Foort van Oosten (Justice) was also initially very reluctant, to the annoyance of the opposition parties in the house. Later from eastern Back on His Words: he found himself “Too Rigid” and Did speak of “Far-Right Rioters”.
2 hours ago
Asylum Demonstration On Malieveld Escalates, Windows of D66 Office Smashed
2 hours ago
What happened in The Hague? On the Malieveld in the Hague, about 3,500 people gathered on Saturday to protest Against the asylum policy, an initiative of the 26-year-old ‘Els Right’. But soon after the start of the demonstration, The Atmosphere Changes: A Group of about 1,500 people occupy the A12, after which things also get out of hand on the malieveld itelf. The Rioters Attack Police and Press, and then Move Into The City Center of the Hague to Cause Destruction to, Among Other Things, The Party Office of D66 and An Attempt is Made To Enter The Binnenhof.
Boxes of People Were arrested. As far as Known, Four Police Officers and Seven Journalists Were (SLIGHTLY) JURDED, AS well as a Catering Employee Who Mediated Between A Customer and A Rioter.