Live debate | Much uncertainty about Israel position VVD

VVD against scout, is open to experienced directors Yesilgöz, as her party previously indicated, sees little in the D66 plan to appoint a scout. An explorer would slow down and ultimately says that we have to do it with the parties who have put a hand under the coalition agreement is her reasoning.

She thinks it is important that the people who will soon be in the cabinet on behalf of VVD and BBB are experienced drivers. “If the Lord Jetten says: I have good people, call them!”

Much unclear about Israel position VVD there is much to do about where VVD is exactly compared to extra sanctions against Israel. Last week the party voted against a D66 motion in which it is called “to ensure legislation as soon as possible that prohibits the import, sale and promotion of goods and services from illegal settlements in occupied Palestinian territory in the Netherlands.” With the support of VVD, this call had had a majority and the government should therefore come up with extra sanctions.

But the VVD did not stand this. Instead, it came with its own motion. It was suggested to take measures “in a European context or with a coalition of like -minded countries”. With the addition to “working simultaneously in national legislation as an alternative for when a European agreement is not made.” This motion also received no majority.

These seem to be the same calls, but the parties that supported the D66 proposal think the VVD-Plam is too lean. “A cloth for bleeding,” Van Vroonhoven said about it. “We would like an import ban of all illegal settlements,” said Yesilgöz.

The question is whether there will now be a new motion that can count on a majority, or whether the impasse remains where the parties only say they want to take extra national sanctions against Israel, but there is no call from the Chamber that can rely on a majority.

Yesilgöz: ‘Not surprising parties with policy’ CDA leader Bontenbal wants to know from VVD member Yesilgöz how the current situation is now. “Two parties want to continue to leave their mark on many files. After all, it’s a campaign,” he says. Only support must be sought, because the two remaining coalition parties VVD and BBB only have 32 seats. The opposition has the majority.

Bontenbal hopes that the parties will make that search fair, so that other parties also get something to say. “How does the VVD deal with nitrogen and migration?” He wonders. Bontenbal hopes for “restraint” of the parties. “I give my confidence, but then the other side must also behave confidently.”

Yesilgöz wants to “not surprise and robbery with policy,” she says. The VVD leader is confident that the ministers of her party will look for sufficient support in the Chamber. Other parties of her may help in the coming months. “If Bontenbal has good people in his club, he can email me.”

Yesilgöz and Van der Plas prior to the debate. Yesilgöz just said that they “convinced” is that the VVD and BBB can jointly put down a solid cabinet. “No matter how complicated the circumstances are.”

VVD asks the cabinet to prepare for Boycot illegal settlements as penultimate it is the turn of VVD member Dilan Yesilgöz. It asks the government to prepare national legislation for an import ban of all illegal settlements. Last week the VVD voted against a motion for such a national measure, which therefore did not make a majority. The VVD wants to first try to set such a sanction at European level. But if that fails, national legislation must be prepared, according to Yesilgöz.

The PvdD is criticized: Ouwehand wonders whether the VVD really wants to do something or now pretends, and the possible action is just putting on the long job. Yesilgöz points out that the EU will be consulted in the coming days and that the plan will soon be discussed. But she agrees that there may not be a majority for such a boycott within the EU.

Bontenbal: ‘The Netherlands needs a stable cabinet’ CDA leader Bontenbal wants to know whether outgoing Prime Minister Schoof has thought to keep the resignation of the NSC ministers on consideration. For example, there would have been more time to think about how to deal with this unprecedented political situation.

The CDA leader also wonders how the cabinet will look for support for next year’s budget. The remaining coalition of VVD and BBB has only 32 of the required 76 seats. “The Netherlands must have a stable cabinet as soon as possible,” says Bontenbal. He calls on the parties to conduct a substantive and neat campaign.

SGP wants experienced drivers in new outgoing cabinet “how to proceed” is also a question that SGP leader Chris Stoffer raises. If it is up to his party, the Chamber will be constructively opposed to the thinned cabinet in the coming period.

Stoffer also has an idea about how the released places in the cabinet should be filled: that must become people “who have earned their spurs in public administration”. Political color is “subordinate” with regard to the SGP.

ChristenUnie and D66 argue for the explorer following D66, ChristenUnie leader Mirjam Bikker also argues for an explorer. In the coming weeks, the outgoing cabinet must limit itself to the necessary, she says. After the elections, according to the CU, it must be explored how the outgoing cabinet can be further formed into a new cabinet. That is why her party is in favor of an explorer.

Bikker also calls the departure of NSC “not courageous, but out of place”. “Today we are staring at the remains of a lame cabinet and the controllability of our country is in danger.”

Esther Ouwehand (Party for the Animals) and Nicolien van Vroonhoven (NSC) are debating the political situation that has arisen.

Ja21 wants to pay more attention to domestic subjects ‘ Walking away does not solve anything, “says JA21 leader Joost Eerdmans about the departed foreign minister Veldkamp.” It is not in the national interest that we have a new political crisis. “

Eerdmans believes that it is only about Gaza and Israel lately “. Domestic themes such as housing shortage, immigration and the fact that women feel unsafe at night deserve more attention from politics.

PvdD: ‘The Netherlands is financing a genocide’ PvdD leader Esther Ouwehand will discuss the situation in Gaza and the role of the Netherlands in her speaking time. The Netherlands is the fourth on the list of investors in Israel, she indicates. “We finance a genocide.”

She also points to help to Gazan children, who will not help the outgoing cabinet in the Netherlands, while she has asked for it. “We must hear from this cabinet that they think that it will be fine in the region. How many children have been helped in the meantime?” She asks the outgoing cabinet.

Volt hopes for the new cabinet for Christmas “Every minute that we will continue to do with this, is a minute that we do not spend on choices for the country,” says Volt leader Laurens Dassen. “A minute in which we do not take measures against genocide in Gaza.” Dassen is craving for the elections, he says. “I want to see a cabinet on the landing before Christmas.”

According to NSC, the cabinet was already acknowledged NSC that vacancies were created in the cabinet, but according to Van Vroonhoven it is not true that the country has now become unmanageable. “The cabinet was already outgoing, was already in injury time and had to look for majorities.”

If it is up to Van Vroonhoven, professional ministers must enter the new outgoing cabinet. According to NSC, the party color is “subordinate to quality and responsibility”.

NSC points to the government program: ‘Action was needed’ Now the word is the party that left the cabinet on Friday: NSC. Group chairman Nicolien van Vroonhoven points out that agreements from the government program have not been met for some time, but that they now also did not seem to apply to the Gaza issue. “The government program says:” Where human rights and the rule of law are seriously violated, […] will express the government and take action. “

That ‘their’ Minister Veldkamp did not get that space, according to NSC, made the party no other option than to leave the cabinet. “Then we have to draw a limit. No matter how painful that is.” She now asks the cabinet what actions they are going to take against Israel.

BBB mainly wants to continue and will reject other proposals BBB leader Caroline van der Plas now thinks it is mainly time to look ahead. “What happened has happened”. Van der Plas wants to “go back to work now and not wait until after the elections”. “BBB is on the bar and we reject all other proposals for that”. With this she refers, among other things, to D66’s proposal to ask a propeller to appoint a new cabinet with experienced drivers.

If she is asked by Laurens Dassen van Volt about BBB’s opinion about a national trade boycott against Israel, she refuses to respond to that. “I don’t want to make it a Gazade debate”.

SP also does not support a motion of no confidence: ‘More chaos and hassle’ SP leader Dijk is fed up. “Since the formation there has been a hassle,” he says about the manners between PVV, VVD, NSC and BBB. And specifically against the departing NSC ministers: “You have made a gang of it.”

In the meantime, no problems are being solved. “Parents and children of the Surcharge Scandal and Groningen wait.” Measures and sanctions against Israel cannot be delayed, because there are daily deaths in Gaza.

How to proceed? Dijk has thought about it. “The SP has considered sending all Beewindmen home. But what more chaos? More hassle?” He looked at the options to bring out the elections on October 29, so that there might be a cabinet before Christmas. But that is impossible.

D66 comes with a proposal for ‘Cabinet of National Unit’ D66 leader Rob Jetten indeed comes with his plan announced yesterday to replace the outgoing cabinet with a, as he calls it, ‘National Unity cabinet’. The Chamber must then appoint an explorer to find out what the national administration can temporarily take on for experienced drivers.

SGP leader Chris Stoffer wonders if it is also possible to ask VVD and BBB to supplement their cabinets team with people from outside. Jetten can really follow that suggestion. He wonders whether those parties will say “yes” to experienced drivers who have a distinct other party color. “I love to hear that.”

Discussion in the Chamber about ‘inhumane’ call the cabinet A discussion arises about the words used in the Chamber. The third speaker on the list, Van Baarle, wondered “how inhumane a cabinet” can be if it falls over “measures to stop the genocide”. Those words are reason for Bosma chairman to intervene, who calls them “unpleasant”. For GL-PvdA that is again reason to intervene. Timmermans points out that Bosma van Baarle has already corrected twice, while Bosma’s party chairman Wilders was “completely empty” about asylum seekers.

Van Baarle points out that he feels limited in his words by Bosma. “What people think of that I take note of that, and I will continue to speak out against actions of Israel”. “And the latter is your right,” says Bosma, “but I said something about your wording.”

PVV does not support no motion of no confidence The PVV will not support a possible motion of no confidence, says Wilders. He does not send the so -called Romp Kabinet, in which only the parties VVD and BBB are still located. “We deal with that in a business and mature way.”

“We support good proposals and not bad,” says Wilders. But he is no longer bound by the previously concluded main lines of agreement between PVV, VVD, NSC and BBB.

A little later in the debate, Baarle’s think leader indeed submits a motion of no confidence against the cabinet. This votes on that after the debate.

Think leader of Baarle shows photos of killed Palestinian children

Think leader Van Baarle starts about the telephone conversation that Wilders recently had with Israeli Prime Minister Natanyahu. He wonders how he can support him, while tens of thousands of deaths have fallen in Gaza because of the attacks of the Israeli army.

Van Baarle holds photos of murdered and mutilated children and a babies up for Wilders. “Look at them,” he tells Wilders. “Do you have a shred of humanity?”

Chamber chairman Bosma (PVV) intervenes. “This is not a debate about Gaza,” he says. It must be about the political situation that has arisen after NSC has left the cabinet. But Wilders still replies: “I could have taken thirteen hundred pictures,” he says, referring to the terror attack of Hamas on October 7, 2023.

On behalf of the outgoing cabinet, Prime Minister Dick Schoof, Deputy Prime Minister Sophie Hermans (VVD) and Deputy Prime Minister Mona Keijzer (BBB) ​​present at the debate.

Bikker (CU) disappointed in Wilders Bikker (CU) is disappointed in Wilders. Democracy is also making concessions and accountability, says Bikker. Wilders does not do that in her eyes. “That is disappointing.”

Wilders does not think he is responsible for the current situation. He even hopes to be the biggest again the next elections and gives a warning to the voters. “This is the last chance before it will definitely go wrong. And that chance is with my party.”

Bikker, who is visibly shaking ‘no’ with Wilders’ words, gives a disclaimer to the same voters. “Make sure you don’t give confidence to people who mess it up.” Bikker says that there were plenty of opportunities to take steps on asylum and migration. “I expected more statesmanship.”

Wilders blames the cabinet ‘Chaos’ PVV leader Geert Wilders starts his contribution that this cabinet is “a chaos”. Wilders starts his contribution with these words more often. Now it seems somewhat crazy, because in the past two years his party has often been part of that chaos. The public gallery is therefore laughed.

He now blames NSC a lot. In his eyes, that party is the fault of all political misery. According to him, the PVV was “the most constructive party” of the old cabinet. Among other things because the PVV as the largest party gave up premiership and then did not agree to enter the Asylum Nood Act. “The Netherlands craves a new cabinet. As far as I’m concerned, that will be the Wilders 1 cabinet,” says Wilders.

GL-PvdA will look constructively at the cabinet, but wants to take action for Gaza The first word is the largest opposition party GL-PvdA. Frans Timmermans emphasizes in his speaking text the fear that the country will stop now. His party will look constructively at the proposals from the cabinet in the coming period.

But, he warns, his party expects actively in the field of Gaza. “A minister has resigned, so the cabinet will have to take steps at that point. Only then can we support policy.” Genocide cannot be ignored as far as Timmermans is concerned. “

Group chairmen conducting the word The debate will start like this. The word will be on all party leaders, as can be seen on the speaker list. That is quite common with debates that deal with things like this. Every party leader gets four minutes of speaking time.

Officially it is still recess in the room. Yet the period in which the Chamber does not meet this summer is different from usual. It is more common that the MPs are recalled to the Chamber for important things during recess, but with today’s debate the counter for this recess is already three. Earlier, the House had to vote on state aid for shipbuilder Damen and there was debated about the situation in Gaza, which resulted in the departure of NSC from the cabinet.

VVD and BBB have divided released places themselves, doubt in the room after the PVV left the cabinet in June, the places released were distributed by VVD, BBB and NSC. Even now, VVD and BBB want to take care of the released positions themselves. The puzzle for that was laid last night, although it is not yet known what the distribution is and who should become the new ministers and state secretaries.

There is doubt in the room. The new outgoing cabinet will soon be able to fall back on the 32 seats of VVD and BBB. Finding majorities for cabinet plans then becomes quite complicated.

With the departure of NSC, another stone was removed from the already rickety structure of the Schoof cabinet. But nothing (yet) changes for the Israel race. You can read more about that here.

Chamber debates about political situation after departure NSC the House of Representatives Will Debate The ‘Political Situation that has arisen’ from 10.15 am, as the departure of NSC from the Cabinet is referred to in the house agenda.

NSC Minister Caspar Veldkamp (Foreign Affairs) Decided to Step Down on Friday after He could not agree on additional Measures Against Israel with the Caretaker Cabinet. The rest of the NSC Flotilla Followed Him.

VVD Opposes Explorer, but is open to experienced administrators Yesilgöz Sees Little in the D66 Plan to Appoint an Explorer, As Her Party Has Previously Indicated. An Explorer would go delay and ultimately say that we have to do it with the parties that have signed the coalition agreement, is the reasons.

She believes it is important that the people who will son come to the cabinet on Behalf of VVD and BBB Are Experience Administrators. “If Mr. Jetten Says: I have good people, call them!”

Much Unclear About VVD’s Position on Israel There Is Much to Do About Where VVD stands Exactly in Relation to Additional Sanctions Against Israel. Last week, The Party Voted Against A D66 Motion Calling For “Legis Lation to Be Put In Place As Soon As Possible to Prosibit The Import, Sale And Promotion of Goods And Services From Illegal Settlements in Occupied Palestinian Territory in The Netherlands.” With the support of VVD, this call would have had a majority and the cabinet would have to come up with additional sanctions.

But the vvd did not support this. Instead, it came up with its own motion. IT Suggested Taking Measures “at European Level Or With A Coalition of Like-Minded Countries.” With the addition to “SimultaneUously Work on National Legislation as An Alternative in Case A European Agreement Fails to Materialize.” This motion also failed to gain a majority.

These seem to be the same calls, but the parties that supported the d66 proposal find the vvd’s plan Too Mager. “A Drop in The Bucket,” Van Vroonhoven Said About It. “We would like an import ban on all illegal settlements,” Yesilgöz Said.

The Question is Whether a New Motion Will Now Be Put Forward That Can Count On A Majority, Or Whether the Impasse Willin, With Parties Only Saying That They Want to take Additional National Sanctions Against Israel, But Without A Call From The House Is born expers.

Yesilgöz: ‘Don’t surprise parties with policy’ CDA Leader Bontenbal Wantsbal Wants to Know from VVD Member Yesilgöz How to Process with the Current Situation. “Two Parties because to make to make their mark on many issues. After all, it’s campaigning,” he says. Support Must Be Sought, However, because the Two Remoining Coalition Parties VVD and BBB Only Have 32 Seats. The opposition has the majority.

Bontenbal Hopes That the Parties Will Conduct That Search Fairly, So That Other Parties also Get A Say. “How will the vvd deal with this in the area of ​​nitrogen and migration?” Hey Wonders. Bontenbal Hopes for “RESTRUIT” from the parties. “I give my trust, but then the other side must also Behave in a Trustworthy Manner.”

Yesilgöz does not want to “Surprise and Ambush the opposition with policy,” She says. The VVD Leader is Confident that the Government Officials of Her Party Will Seek Sufficient Support in the House. Other parties may help her with this in the coming months. “If Bontenbal has good people in his club, he can email me.”

Yesilgöz and van der Plas Before the Debate. Yesilgöz Just Said That She is “Convinced” That the VVD and BBB Can Jointly Create a Solid Cabinet. “No matter how complicated the circumstances may be.”

VVD Asks Cabinet to Prepare Legislation for Boycott of Illegal Settlements as the Penultimate speaker, It is the Turn of VVD Member Dilan Yesilgöz. She Asks The Cabinet to Prepare National Legislet for an Import Ban on All Illegal Settlements. Last week, The VVD Voted Against A Motion For Such A National Measure, which Therefore Did Not Gain a Majority. The VVD Wants To Try To Introduction Such A Sanction at European Level First. But if that fails, National legislation must be prepared, Accordance to Yesilgöz.

The PvdD is a critical: Ouwehand Wondher the VVD Really Wants To Do Something OR IS NOW Pretending, And is Actually Postponing The Possible Action. Yesilgöz Points Out That Discussions Will Be Held in the EU in the Coming Days and That the Plan Will Therefore Soon Be discussed. But she agrees with ouwehand that May not be a majority within the eu for such a boycott.

Bontenbal: ‘The Netherlands Needs a Stable Cabinet’ CDA Leader Bontenbal Wantsbal Wants to Know Whether Caretaker Prime Minister Schoof Has Considered Keeping the Resignation of the NSC Ministers Under Advisement. This would have allowed more time to think about how to deal with this unprecedented political situation.

The CDA Leader also Wonders How the Cabinet Will Seek Support for Next Year’s Budget. The Remoining Coalition of VVD and BBB Only HAS 32 of the Required 76 Seats. “The Netherlands must have a stable cabinet as soon as possible,” Says Bontenbal. He calls on the parties to conduct a substantive and decent campaign.

SGP Wants Experienced Administrators in New Caretaker Cabinet “What Now?” Is also a Question raised by SGP Leader Chris Stoffer. As far as his party is concerned, the house should take a constructive approach to the depleted cabinet in the coming period.

Stoffer also has an idea about how the vacant positions in the cabinet should be filled: they should be people “who have earned their spurs in public administration.” Political Color is “Subordinate” as far as the SGP is concerned.

Christianunion and D66 Advocate for an Explorer Following D66, Christianunion Leader Mirjam Bikker also Advocates for an Explorer. In The Coming Weeks, The Caretaker Cabinet Should Limit Itelf to What is Necessary, She Says. After the Elections, Accordance to the Cu, it should be explored How the Caretaker Cabinet Can Continue Until a New Cabinet Has Been formed. That is why her party is in favor of an explorer.

Bikker Further Calls The Departure of NSC “Not CourageOn, but misplaced.” “Today we Are Staring at the Remnants of a Crippled Cabinet and the Governability of Our Country is in Danger.”

Esther Ouwehand (Party for the Animals) and Nicolien van Vroonhoven (NSC) Are Debating the Political Situation That Has Arisen.

JA21 WILDS MORE Attention for Domestic Issues ‘ Walking Away Solves Nothing, “Says Ja21 Leader Joost Eerdmans About the Departed Foreign Minister Veldkamp.” It is not in the Country’s interest that we have a new political crisis. “

Eerdmans Believes that Lattely “It’s only about Gaza and Israel.” Domestic Issues Such As the Housing Shortage, Immigration and the Fact that Women Feel Unsafe At Night Deserve More Attention from Politicians in His Eyes.

PvdD: ‘The Netherlands is fining a genocide’ Pvdd Leader Esther Ouwehand Spends Much of her speaking time on the situation in Gaza and the Role of the Netherlands in IT. The Netherlands is Fourth on the List of Investors in Israel, She Indicates. “We are finance a genocide.”

She also points to aid to gazan children, which the caretaker cabinet will not help in the Netherlands, just though they have asked for it. “We need to hear from this cabinet that they think it will be all right through aid in the region. How many children have bone helped so far?” She Asks The Caretaker Cabinet.

Volt hopes for a new cabinet before Christmas “Every minute we continuously with this, a minute we don’t spend on Choices for the country,” Says Volt Leader Laurens Dassen. “A minute in which we do not take Measures Against Genocide in Gaza.” Dassen is lunging for the elections, he says. “I want to see a cabinet on the podium before Christmas.”

Accordance to NSC, Cabinet was Already in Injury Time NSC Acknowledges That Vacancies Have Arisen in the Cabinet Due to the Departure, but According to Van Vroonhoven It is not True That the Country Has Now Become Ungovernable. “The Cabinet was Already Caretaker, Already was in Injury Time and Already had to look for majorities.”

As Far As van Vroonhoven is concerned, there should be professional ministers in the new caretaker cabinet. Accordance to NSC, Party Color is “Subordinate to Quality and Responsibility.”

NSC Points to Government Program: ‘Action was Necessary’ Now It is the Turn of the Party That Left the Cabinet on Friday: NSC. Group Chairman Nicolien van Vroonhoven Points Out That Agreements from the Government Program had not leg Complied with for some time, but that thesis now also seemed not to Apply to the Gaza Issue. “The Government Program States:” Where Human Rights and the Rule of Law are Seriously Violated, […] The Cabinet Will Speak Out and Take Action. “

The fact that ‘Their’ Minister Veldkamp was not given that space accordance to NSC meant that the party saw no option other than to step out of the cabinet. “Then we have to draw a line. However Painful that May be.” She is now Asking the Cabinet What Actions They Now Going to Take Against Israel.

BBB Mainly Wants to Continue and Will Reject Other Proposals BBB Leader Caroline van der Plas Thinks It is Now Mainly Time to Look Ahead. “What happened, happened.” Van der Plas Wants To “Get Back To Work Now and Not Wait Until After the Elections.” “BBB is up to the task and we reject all other proposals for that.” With that, she refers, among other things, to the proposal of d66 to ask a proposer to appoint a new cabinet with experientiary administrators.

When Laurens Dassen or Volts Asks Her About The Opinion of BBB about a National Trade Boycott Against Israel, She Refuses to Respond To That. “I don’t want to make it a gaza debate.”

SP also does not support a motion of no confidence: ‘Even more chaos and hasle’ SP Leader Dijk is Fed Up. “Since the formation there has bone mutual hasle,” he says about the manners between pvv, vvd, nsc and bbb. And specifically Against the Departing NSC Government Officials: “You have made a mess of it.”

Meanwhile, no problems are being solved. “Parents and Children of the Benefits Scandal and Groningen are Waiting.” Measures and Sanctions Against Israel Cannot Be Delayed Either, because people are Dying Daily in Gaza.

What Now? Dijk Has Thought about it. “The SP HAS Considered Sending All Government Officials Home. But then what? Even more chaos? Even more Hassle?” He has looked at the options to bring the elections on October 29 forward, so that there might be a cabinet before Christmas. But that is legal impossible.

D66 Comes with Proposal for ‘Cabinet of National Unity’ D66 Leader Rob Jetten is Indeed Coming Up With His Plan Announced Yesterday to Replace the Caretaker Cabinet with A, As HE Calls It, ‘Cabinet of National Unity’. The House Must then Appoint An Explorer Who Investigates What Experienced Administrators Can Temporarily Take On The National Administration.

SGP Leader Chris Stoffer Wondher It is also Possible to Ask VVD and BBB to Supplement Their Cabinet Team Themselves with People from Outside. Jetten can really follow that suggestion. He does wonder Whether parties Will Say “YES” to Experienced administrators who have a clearly different party color. “I would love to hear that.”

Discussion in House About Caling Cabinet ‘Inhuman’ A Discussion Arises about the Words Used in the House. The Third Speaker on The List, Van Baarle, Wondered “How Inhuman a Cabinet” Can Be If It Falls About “Measures to Stop the Genocide.” Those words are reason for chairman bosma to intervene, who calls them “unpleasant.” For GL-Pvda that is again reason to intervene. Timmermans Points Out That Bosma Has Already Corrected by Baarle Twice, While Bosma’s Group Chairman Wilders was “Allowed to Run Completely Empty” About Asylum Seekers.

Van Baarle Points Out That Feels Limited in His Words by Bosma. “I take note of what people think of it, and I will continuously to speak out against acts of Israel.” “And the Latter is Your Right,” Says Bosma, “But I Said Something about your turning.”

PVV does not support a motion of no confidence the PVV will not support a Possible motion of no confidence, Says Wilders. He is not sending the so-called rump cabinet, in which only the parties vvd and bbb are still sitting, home. “We are going to deal with that in a businesslike and mature way.”

“We support good proposals and not bad ones,” Says Wilders. But he is no longer bound by the earlier main outline agreement between pvv, vvd, nsc and bbb.

A little later in The Debate, think leader of Baarle Does Indeed Submit A Motion of No Confidence Against the Cabinet. That will be voted on after the debate.

Think Leader of Baarle shows photos of deceased Palestinian children

Think Leader Van Baarle Starts About the Phone Call That Wilders Recently Had Israeli Prime Minister Natanyahu. The Wonders How He can support him, while Tens of Thousands of Deaths in Gaza Have Been Caaated by the Attacks of the Israeli Army.

Van Baarle Holds Up Photos of Murdered and Mutilated Children and Babies for Wilders. “Look at them,” he says to Wilders. “Do you have an ounce of humanity?”

House speaker Bosma (PVV) Intervenes. “This is not a debate about Gaza,” he says. It should be about the political situation that has aris after nsc left the cabinet. But Wilders Still Answers: “I Could Have Brought Thirteen Hundred Pictures with Me,” He says, referring to the terrorist Attack by Hamas on October 7, 2023.

Scroll to Top