An American court believes that Uber is not liable for the assault of a woman who says he has been attacked by a Uber driver. Reuters news agency reports this on the basis of one of her lawyers.
The court of San Francisco does judge that Uber has been negligent in protecting the woman. Yet that negligence would not have been a substantial factor in what happened to the woman.
This was the first of more than three thousand similar things that run in various Californian courts.
The indictment in the case that has now been ruled dates from 2021. The incident played in 2016. The woman states that the Uber driver had been run into a side street, held her will against her will and kissed.
Uber says he has been making an effort for years to raise the safety slat and to continue to do so in the coming years. The case of this woman was chosen as the first so -called Bellwether : a case that can serve as a guideline for future similar matters.
Possibly a handle for settlements
The outcome can also offer a handle for any settlements. The woman’s lawyers had asked the jury for compensation of between 175,000 and 1.2 million dollars (150,000-1 million euros) for each year of her life. In addition, the amounts for the years around the event rose.
The lawyers did not request an additional compensation on top of the aforementioned amount, which is common in the US in these types of affairs. A warning signal must then go out.
Uber believes that drivers are sufficiently screened
In the cases against Uber, it is stated that the company behind the Taxiapp knew that drivers were bothering customers, but withheld figures about it.
The company would also be aware that linking female drivers to female customers can help reduce the number of cases, just like installing cameras in the cars.
Uber does not hold full for the behavior of the drivers who link the company to customers. Uber is behind the current screening of drivers and says he is open enough about the incidents.
An American Court Has Ruled That Uber is not Liable for the Assault of a Woman Who Says She was Attacked by An Uber Driver. This is reported by news agency reuters based on one of her lawyers.
The San Francisco Court Does Rule That Uber was Negligent in Protecting the Woman. However, that negligence would not have leg a substantial factor in what happened to the woman.
This was the first of more than Three Thousand Similar Cases Pending in Various California Courts.
The Indictment in the Case Now Ruled on Dates From 2021. The Incident Occurred in 2016. The Woman States That The Uber Driver Drove Down A Side Street, Held Her Against Her Will and Kissed Her.
Uber Says it has legs working for years to raise the safety bar and will continuous to do so in the coming years. This Woman’s Case Has Been Chosen As the First So-Called Bellwether : A Case that can Serve as a guide for future Similar Cases.
Possible Handle for Settlements
The outcome may also sacrifice a handle for possible settlements. The Woman’s Lawyers had asked the jury for damages of between $ 175,000 and $ 1.2 million (€ 150,000-1 million) for Each Year of Her Life. The Amounts for the Years around the event inceased.
The Lawyers Did Not Request Additional Damages On Top of the Aforementioned Amount, which is common in the US in thesis types of cases. A Warning Signal must be Issued from this.
Uber believes drivers are sufficiently screened
The Cases Against Uber Allege That The Company Behind The Taxi App Knew That Drivers Were Harassing Customers, But Withheld Figures About this.
The Company would also be aware that pairing female drivers with female customer can help reduce the number of cases, as can installing cameras in cars.
Uber Maintains That It is not Liable for the Behavior of the Drivers That The Company Connects to Customers. Uber stands behind the current screening of drivers and says it is open enough about the incidents.