Hello and Welcome to this live blog! Here we will keep you informed of the parliamentary debate about the riots in The Hague last Saturday.
Yesilgöz angry with language use Dijk: ‘This is really so bad’ SP’er Jimmy Dijk takes the floor and assesses the police action of Minister Eelco Heinen (Finance, VVD) at WNL on Sunday . “We see Minister Heinen on Sunday at Wakker Nederland trivializing fascist violence and trying to depoliticize.”
Heinen said on Sunday at that program, among other things, that violence should be rejected, “but to make it politically political and unnecessary. You are going to make things politically that have nothing to do with politics.”
The words of Dijk provide anger at Yesilgöz. “You can’t put ministers away here as if they were going to normalize or nuance fascism. This is so bad that I am really looking for words.” Dijk then calls it “extremely bad” to name “Het Bestje by the name” in such a TV program.
Jetten: ‘You can draw a line yourself as leader of the VVD’ D66 leader Jetten holds Yesilgöz (VVD) for that not polarization, but normalization of right-wing extremism is the problem. The NCTV writes that. According to Jetten, it is also up to politics to speak out. “Not a word about all the hatred that Wilders stands out of stalls. Where is the role of the VVD in contrasting right-wing extremism in politics that stirs up hatred and division?” Wilders has already got out of the coalition with the VVD, Jetten tells Yesilgöz. “You don’t have to be afraid of him. You can draw a line yourself as the VVD leader.”
Yesilgöz replies that she does not share “the obsession with Wilders” with Jetten. “I am working on the police who have to keep us safe.” The VVD member says he is all the violence. “Today it is about right-wing extremism. But that also applies to the UvA riots whereby millions of euros in damage are caused, with the Maccabirellen and with the farmers who entered a provincial government.” She comes with measures that the police must give more resources.
Jetten calls it “very weak” from Yesilgöz that she does not want to stand up, but only argues for extra resources.
Ministers Frank Rijkaart (Interior) and Foort van Oosten (Justice and Security) are present on behalf of the cabinet. Van Baarle had also asked for Prime Minister Dick Schoof at his application for this debate, but he is in New York for the general meeting of the UN.
‘Connecting tone’ by Yesilgöz arouses irritation The “connecting tone” of VVD leader Yesilgöz arouses irritation at Ouwehand (PvdD). Because the VVD initially did not want to link the riots to the extreme right and did not want to make it political. “If you don’t get up against the extreme right, but facilitates it, then you put agents in danger,” says Ouwehand. She refers to the government participation with the PVV with facilitating. Dassen from Volt also wants Yesilgöz to make more work on “standards”. That also advises terror fighter NCTV.
Yesilgöz does not accept it, although that does not happen automatically. “I find that difficult,” she says. But the “you baking” in the room only distracts in her eyes. “But then it’s not about the safety of our agents.”
Think leader of Baarle thinks Yesilgöz is hypocritical. Because, according to him, the VVD was at the forefront of condemning the riots with the Maccabi supporters. Then there was an “integration problem” of Dutch people with a non-Western background.
VVD does not want to ‘throw muddy’, but measures VVD member Dilan Yesilgöz finds the debate so far “intensely embarrassing”. She wants measures instead of “mud throwing” and immediately announces seven measures that must be introduced according to the VVD.
For example, the party wants to be hurled with adjustments to the current demonstration law and the ban on face -covering clothing in demonstrations.
The VVD also wants minimum penalties for this type of violence. Moreover, according to the Doxing party, the online sharing of personal data with the aim of intimidating someone must become punishable. Agents have to deal with that: even after the riots of Saturday, according to police association, NPB photos of agents are distributed.
Parties want to reflect Wilders, who does not give PVV member a recurring pattern in the room: party leaders Timmermans (GL-PvdA), Jetten (D66), Bontenbal (CDA), Bikker (CU) and Dassen (Volt) ask whether PVV leader Wilders can moderate his tone. Because hard statements by politicians can contribute to the radicalization of young people in particular. That can result in right -wing extremist violence, warns terror fighter NCTV. The party leaders then point Wilders when he takes to the arrival of AZCs or when he talks about “fighting back” in last week’s debate.
These debates have already been conducted with Wilders, always with the same outcome. Wilders contradicts that his words have anything to do with last weekend’s violence. He wants democratic resistance and therefore quotes the first sentence from his election program: “The PVV is in democratic resistance”.
He does not intend to moderate his words. “I keep speaking as I speak until the problems are solved,” says the PVV player. He ignores the warnings of the NCTV.
Jetten against Wilders: “You have to take responsibility” Jetten notes that the NCTV says that “the words of politicians matter,” he tells Wilders. “Let’s take a look at those words. Mr. Wilders calls journalists rigid of the Richel, judge politically biased and the House of Representatives a fake parliament. Ministers are sworn in who proudly wore a prince flag.”
Former PVV minister Reinette Klever (Foreign Trade) also once carried a pin of the Prinsenvlag when she was still a member of parliament. She later said that it had a family sign for her, given the role of her family in the Eighty Years’ War. But the prince flag is now mainly associated with a symbol of the NSB.
According to Jetten, Wilders also calls on to fight. He refers to last week’s general political considerations. Wilders then said: “Do we choose to sink further into the swamp with left-liberal multiculturalism, or are we finally fighting back?”
Just like Timmermans, Jetten draws attention to the words that Wilders used for protests against AZCs. For example, Wilders said in Helmond that the protesters there “should not accept” the decision of the mayor. “You will have to take responsibility,” says Jetten. Wilders points out that he naturally rejects violence. But according to him, extremism is best tackled “by not taking turns against Mr Wilders and showing your own inability”.
Wilders: ‘Go away with your NCTV’ CDA leader Bontenbal calls the debate style of PVV leader Wilders polarizing. “We want to depoles.” Bontenbal quotes a report from the NCTV, whereby the terror fighter warns of the extreme right -wing violence. “Most incidents seem to be repeatedly traced back to the political and social fuss that exists in the Netherlands about the arrival and reception of asylum seekers,” writes the service in a report last June.
Bontenbal wants to know Van Wilders if he feels responsible. That is asking about the well -known path of the CDA. Because Wilders is not known to reflect or to put on the fine rug for fierce statements. “Go away with your NCTV,” says Wilders. “The people on the street have nothing to do with an NCTV.” Wilders’ responsibility is something to do about immigration, he says. “The Netherlands is crazy.”
Wilders lashes out to D66 and GL-PvdA Wilders is the second floor and after having briefly taken away from the riots, he lashes out to D66 and GL-PvdA. According to him, they would “want to hit a political salad” from the events. He mentions a number of incidents where, according to him, the parties were “silent”, such as the Pro-Palestinian demonstrations at universities, but that is not true. The parties did respond to this at the time.
This also ensures that Jetten and Timmermans rush to the interruption microphone to put that right. Wilders continues to repeat that they were not there, and starts a reasoning with: “Before Mr Timmermans starts to blister again”. Those words are reason for Chamber President Martin Bosma to intervene.
D66, GL-PvdA and PvdD also ask Bosma to intervene “if lies are told”. “The chairman must help to guard that no unsafe things are being done,” says Ouwehand, for example, hinting in the fierce tone and words of Wilders.
Ouwehand: ‘Van der Plas participates in the suspension by lying’ BBB leader Van der Plas speaks out against the violence, but immediately says the concerns of people about the lack of homes and the number of asylum seekers who come to the Netherlands.
According to Ouwehand (PvdD), Van der Plas has to look at himself. Her party “lied” against the farmers about the nitrogen problem. “Not surprising that they get angry.” Van der Plas is indignant. “I’m not going to participate anymore, but I’m going to answer this,” she says. “Someone chooses to grab a stone and set fire to a police car. Those are individual choices.”
Ouwehand quotes Auschwitz survivor Primo Levi: “It happened and it can happen again.” She adds: “People can be excited and walk behind Charlatans. Van der Plas participates in the suspension by lying.”
Van der Plas strongly denies that she is also responsible for the violence. She calls that accusation “link”.
NSC and DENK cannot find each other in debate about polarization NSC leader Eddy van Hijum comes to the fore to ask Van Baarle for reflection. It is a broader question “how we deal with each other”, says Van Hijum, who asks the think leader to reflect on it himself. For example when it comes to his statement to the former NSC-Buitenlandminister Caspar Veldkamp. But also in the debate that is being conducted, the dichotomy in the room becomes clear again.
Because what follows is that Van Baarle van Hijum points out that it was NSC who went into a cabinet with the PVV and the ministers criticized by DENK. “If there is one normalizer of the extreme right, then it is the NSC group!” Van Hijum repeats that all parties in the Chamber have to reflect, but according to Van Baarle, NSC has no right to point out polarization.
Think announces the motion of no confidence against Justice Minister Van Oosten DENK-Leader Van Baarle may be the first to speak to the debate. “After eighty years, fascists were opened through our streets again,” he begins. “They chanted ‘Sieg Heil’ and did the Hitler salute.”
Van Baarle focuses his dissatisfaction on Justice Minister Van Oosten. “He was not even willing to call a Nazi, a Nazi,” says Van Baarle. The VVD minister initially did not want to say this week which corner the violence of Saturday came to the Malieveld. He came back to that later. Terror fighter NCTV had just advised to state that it was the extreme right -wing violence.
Van Baarle knows enough despite the turn of Van Oosten. “Then you are unsuitable as Minister of Justice.” He already announces a motion of no confidence. The PVV of Wilders is also jointly responsible here according to the think leader. “The seeds are being planted. Here in the room. By Wilders.”
The debate will start at 10.15 am and is planned for 6.30 pm tonight for the time being. First is the word to think leader Stephan van Baarle. He applied for the debate. All parties have put their party leader forward to speak today. That is common with this type of current debates.
Pamphlet against violence not signed by left -wing parties parties disagree about a joint statement to condemn the extreme right -wing violence. Left -wing parties do not want to be with right -wing parties such as FVD and PVV under the pamphlet of the ChristenUnie.
“The violence on the Malieveld is unacceptable,” heads the pamphlet. “We convince the right-wing extremist violence,” is further down the text.
GroenLinks-PvdA, D66, SP, Party for the Animals and DENK call it unbelievable that FVD and PVV are also under the statement. Member of Parliament Jan Paternotte of D66 believes that in this way conspiracy theories of Gideon van Meijeren (FVD) that the extreme left antifa and the police would have provoked the violence, are laundered. Earlier statements from PVV leader Geert Wilders about not accepting democratic decisions are a reason not to sign.
GroenLinks-PvdA joins the words of Paternotte and calls it unbelievable. “After years of incorporating and setting up groups of people, it is not enough to condemn the extreme right -wing political violence. Then the distribution of ideas that lead to violence must be stopped.”
For PvdD trust in the air is the news that the minister did not initially follow the advice of the NCTV, causes annoyance to several parties.
“The question of trust is on the table,” said PvdD leader Esther Ouwehand yesterday on X. DENK-foreman Stephan van Baarle finds it “unsuitable and the position of Minister unworthy” if you “willingly and know about Nazis and extreme right rig”.
If a motion of no confidence follows, then the chance is still small that it will get a majority.
NCTV had advised riots immediately as ‘extreme right’ to label the initially cautious Minister of Oosten had received advice from the NCTV not only to “racer, rig or hooligans, without naming the underlying right-wing extremist ideas”.
Otherwise, no “complete picture of reality” would be sketched and right-wing extremist ideas would not be protected as a result, “but even further normalized”, it can be read in the advice published on Wednesday evening.
The Hague had massive riots with ‘extreme violence’ in demonstration not expected The municipality of The Hague did not expect that the demonstration against the asylum policy on the Malieveld would result in violence, riots and destructions on Saturday. There were, however, “soft signals” of malicious people, Mayor Jan van Zanen writes to the city council on Wednesday. Read on here.
Furious reactions in politics, but also mutual annoyance politicians react with horror at the events in The Hague. Outgoing Prime Minister Dick Schoof called the riots “performs unacceptable” and similar sounds also came from other politicians. But D66 leader Rob Jetten and GL-PVDA leader Frans Timmermans also pointed out that they think that the politics that are incurred also has a role in this, and in particular their colleague Geert Wilders.
According to Jetten, the rioters used slogans from Wilders. “Then it is up to all democratic forces to say: we will not pick this,” says Jetten. He also spoke of “political violence”, partly due to the extreme right -wing expressions and Nazi symbolism that could be seen during the demonstration.
Minister Eelco Heinen (Finance) said that the events should not be made politically as far as he is concerned. Responsible Minister Foort van Oosten (Justice) was also very cautious in the first instance, to the annoyance of the opposition parties in the Chamber. Later Van Oosten returned to his words: he found himself “too star” and still spoke of “extreme right -wing rioters”.
What happened in The Hague? On the Malieveld in The Hague, around 3,500 people came together on Saturday to protest against the asylum policy, an initiative of the 26-year-old ‘Els Right’. But soon after the start of the demonstration, the atmosphere turns: a group of about 1,500 people occupies the A12, after which it also gets out of hand on the Malieveld itself. The rioters attack the police and the press, and then put in the city center of The Hague to address destruction to, among others, the party office of D66 and is an attempt to enter the Binnenhof.
Dozens of people were arrested. As far as we know, four agents and seven journalists (slightly) were injured, as well as a catering employee who mediated between a customer and a rioter.
Hello and Welcome to this Live Blog! Here we keep you informed of the parliamentary debate on the riots in the Hague last Saturday.
Yesilgöz Angry at Dijk’s use of Language: ‘This is really so bad’ SP Member Jimmy Dijk Takes the Floor and Assesses the Police Action of Minister Eelco Heinen (Finance, VVD) at WNL on Sunday . “On Sunday at Wakker Nederland , we see minister Heinen downplaying and trying to depoliticize the fascist violence.”
Heinen Said on Sunday on that program, Among Other Things, That the Violence must be condemned, “But to immediately make it political is intense and unnecessary. You are going to make things political that have nothing to do with politics.”
Dijk’s Words Provoke Anger in Yesilgöz. “You can’t dismiss ministers here as if they look to normalize or nuance fascism. This is so bad that I’m really look for words.” Dijk then calls it “extremely bath” not to “call a spade a spade” in such a TV program.
Jetten: ‘You can draw a line yourself as Leader of the VVD’ D66 Leader Jetten Argues to Yesilgöz (VVD) That the Problem is not polarzation, but the normalization of right-wing extremism. This is what the NCTV Writes. Accordance to jetten, it is also up to politics to speak out. “Not a word about all the hatred that Wilders is spewing. Where is the role of the vvd in contradicting right-wing extremism in politics that fuels hatred and division?” Wilders Has Already Left the Coalition with the VVD, Jetten Tells Yesilgöz. “You don’t have to be afraid of him. You can draw a line yourself as leader of the vvd.”
Yesilgöz replies that she does not share “the obsession with wilders” with jetten. “I am working with the police officers who have to keep us safe.” The VVD Member Says She Condemns All Violence. “Today is about Right-Wing Extremism. But that also applies to the Uva Riere Millions of Euros Worth of Damage is caused, with the maccabi riots and with the farmers who drove a provincial government building.” She Comes Up With Measures That Should Give the Police More Resources.
Jetten calls it “very weak” or yesilgöz that she does not want to set norms, but only pleads for extra resources.
On Behalf of the Cabinet, Ministers Frank Rijkaart (Home Affairs) and Foort van Oosten (Justice and Security) are present. Van Baarle also had requested prime minister Dick Schoof for his application for this debate, but he is in New York for the un general assembly.
‘Connecting Tone’ or Yesilgöz Causes Irritation the “Connecting Tone” or VVD Leader Yesilgöz Causes Irritation to Ouwehand (PvdD). Because the VVD initially did not because to link the riots to the extreme right and did not want to make it political. “If you don’t stand up again the extreme right, but facilitation it, you put officers in Danger,” Says Ouwehand. With facilitation, she refers to the cabinet participation with the PVV. Dassen or volts also hens yesilgöz to do more to “normalize”. That is what the NCTV counter-terrorism agency advises as well.
Yesilgöz does not respond to it, although it does not come naturally. “I think that’s difficult,” She says. But the “you-too arguments” in the house only distract from it in her eyes. “But then it’s not about the safety of our officers.”
Think Leader of Baarle Thinks Yesilgöz is hypocritic. Because, Accordance to him, the VVD was at the forefront when condemning the riots with the maccabi supporters. At the time, there was an “integration problem” or Dutch people with a non-western background.
VVD does not want to ‘Mudsling’, But Measures VVD Member Dilan Yesilgöz Thinks the Debate So far is “Intenely embarrassing”. Shey Wants Measures Insead of “Mudslinging” and Imediately Announces Seven Measures That the VVD Believe Baileves Should Be Implemented.
For Example, the Party Wants to Expedite Adjustments to the Current Demonstration Law and the Ban on Face covering Clothing Duration Demonstrations.
The VVD also Wants Minimum sentences for this type of violence. In Addition, Accordance to the Party, Doxing, The Online Sharing of Personal Data with the Aim of Intimidating Someone, Must Be Made Punishable. Agents have to deal with this: Accordance to police union npb, photos of agents have also bone distributed after Saturday’s riots.
Parties because reflection from Wilders, which the PVV Member does not give a recurring pattern in the house: party leaders carpermans (GL-Pvda), Jetten (D66), Bontenbal (CDA), Bikker (CU) and Dassen (Volt) Ask Wilders Wilders His Tone. Because Harsh Statements by Politicians can Contribute to the Radicalization of Especiate Young People. This can result in Right-Wing Extremist Violence, Warns Counter-terrorism Agency NCTV. The Party Leaders Point This Out To Wilders When He Lashes Out At The Arrival of Asylum CENTERS OR When He Talks About “Fighting Back” in Last Week’s Debate.
These debates have Been Conducted Countless Times with Wilders, With the Same Outcome Every Time. Wilders contradicts that his words have anything to do with the violence of last weekend. The Wants Democratic Resistance and Therefore Quotes The First Sentence from His Election Program: “The PVV is Ento Into Democratic Resistance”.
He does not intend to moderate his words. “I will continue to speak as I speak, Until the Problems are solved,” Says the PVV Member. He Dismisses the Warnings from the NCTV.
Jetten to Wilders: ‘You must take response’ jetten notes that the nctv says that “the words of politicians matter”, he says to Wilders. “Let’s take a look at those words. Mr. Wilders calls journalists scum of the earth, Judges political biased and the house of representatives a fake parliament. Ministers are sworn in who proudly wore a prince’s flag.”
Former PVV Minister Reinette Klever (Foreign Trade) also Once Wore A Pin of the Prince’s Flag When She was Still A Member of Parliament. She later Said Herself that it had a Family Meaning for Her, Given the Role of Her Family in the Eighty Years’ War. But the Prince’s Flag is now mainly associated with a symbol of the nsb.
Accordance to Jetten, Wilders also calls for fighting. The refers to the general political reflections of last week. Wilders Then Said: “Do we Choose to Sink Further Into the Swamp With Liberal Multiculturalism, or do we finally fight back?”
Jetten, Like Timmermans, Draws Attention to the Words Wilders Has Used for Protests Against Asylum Centers. For Example, Wilders Said in Helmond That The Demonstrators There “Should Not Accept” The Mayor’s Decision. “You will have to take responsibility,” Jetten Thinks. Wilders Points Out That He Of Course Condemns Violence. But accordance to him, extremism is best tackled “by not yelling at Mr. Wilders in Turn and Showing Your Own Inability”.
Wilders: ‘Get Away with your nctv’ CDA Leader Bontenbal Calls the Debating Style of PVV Leader Wilders Polariaing. “We want to depoliticize.” Bontenbal quotes A report from the NCTV, in which the counter-terrorism agency Warns of Right-Wing Extremist Violence. “Most Incidents Seem to Be Largely Attributed to the Political and Social Utrar in the Netherlands About the Arrival and Reception of Asylum Seekers,” The Service Writes in A Report From Last June.
Bontenbal Wants To Know From Wilders Whether He Feels Responsible. That is Asking the CDA Member for the Known Way. Because Wilders is not Known for Reflecting or Putting on the Sackcloth for Harsh Statements. “Get away with your nctv,” Says Wilders. “The People on the Street Have Nothing to Do With An NCTV.” Wilders’ Responsibility is to do something about immigration, he says. “The Netherlands is Fed Up.”
Wilders Lashes Out at D66 and GL-Pvda Wilders Takes The Floor As The Second Speaker and After Letterly Distancing himself from the Riots, He Lashes Out At D66 and GL-PvdA. Accordance to him, they would “want to make political capital” out of the events. He mentions a number of incidents in which, accordance to him, the parties were “silent”, Such as the pro-Palestinian demonstrations at universities, but that is not true. The Parties Did Respond To That At The Time.
That also ensures that jetten and carpermans rush to the interrupt microphone to correct that. Wilders keeps repeating that they were not there, and starts a reasoning with: “Before Mr. Timmermans Starts Bleating Again”. Those words are reason for speaker of the house martin bosma to intervene.
D66, GL-PVDA and PvdD also Ask Bosma to Intervene “If Lies Are Told”. “The Chairman must help to ensure that no unsafe things are done,” Says Ouwehand, for Example, Hinting at Wilders’ Fierce Tone and Words Just Now.
Ouwehand: ‘Van der Plas is participating in the incitement by Lyping’ BBB Leader van der Plas Speaks Out Against the Violence, But Immediately Afterwards Says That She Understands The Concerns Of People About The Lack of Housing and The Number of Asylum.
Accordance to Ouwehand (PvdD), Van der Plas Should Mainly Look at Herself. Her party “song” to the farmers about the nitrogen problem. “Not so crazy that they get angry.” Van der Plas is Outraged. “I’m not going to participate in this anymore, but I will answer it,” She says. “Someone Chooses to Pick Up A Stone and Set A Police Car on Fire. Those Are Individual Choices.”
Ouwehand quotes Auschwitz survivor Primo Levi: “It happened and it can happen again.” She Adds: “People can be incited and follow charlatans. Van der Plas is participating in the incitement by Lying.”
Van der Plas Vehemently Denies That She is also Responsible for the Violence. She calls that accusation “fishy”.
NSC and think Cannot Find Each Other in a Debate About Polariazation NSC Leader Eddy van Hijum Comes Forward to Ask from Baarle for Reflection. It is a Broader Question “How we deal with each other”, Van Hijum Thinks, who asks the think leader to reflect on that himself. For Example, When it comes to his statement to the Former NSC Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp. But also in the debate that follows, The Division in the House Becomes Clear Again.
Because What Follows is that of Baarle Points Out to Hijum That It was the NSC that Went Into A Cabinet with the PVV and the Ministers Who Were Much Criticized by DENK. “If there is one normalizer of the extreme right, it is the nsc faction!” Van Hijum repeats that all parties in the house must reflect, but accordance to from Baarle, NSC Has No Right to Point to Polariazation.
Think Announces Motion of No Confidence Against Justice Minister Van Oosten Think Leader Van Baarle, As the Applicant of the Debate, is the first to speak. “After Eighty years, fascists were openly walking our streets again,” he’s inkins. “They chanted ‘sieg Heil’ and Did the Hitler Salute.”
Van Baarle Directs His Displeasure at Justice Minister Van Oosten. “He was just as willing to call a Nazi a Nazi,” Says van Baarle. The VVD Administrator Initial Did Not Want to say this week from which corner the violence of Saturday on the Malieveld Came. Hey later came back on that. Counter-terrorism Agency NCTV had advised to mention that it was Right-Wing Extremist Violence.
Despite of Oosten’s turnaround, from Baarle Knows Enough. “Then you are unsuitable as Minister of Justice.” He already announces a motion of no confidence. Accordance to the think leader, Wilders’ PVV is also partly responsions for this. “The Seeds are planted. Here in the house. By Wilders.”
The debate will start at 10:15 am and is Provisionally Scheduled Until 6:30 pm Tonight. First to speak is DENK LEADER Stephan van Baarle. He requested the debate. All parties have put Forward Their top candidates to speak Today. That is common with this child of current debates.
Pamphlet Against Violence not signed by left-wing parties do not agree on a joint statement to condemn right-wing extremist violence. Left-Wing Parties do not because to be with right-wing parties Such as fvd and PVV Under the Pamphlet of the Christianunion.
“The Violence on the Malieveld is unacceptable,” The Pamphlet Heads. “We Strongly Condemn Right-Wing Extremist Violence,” The Text Continues.
GroenLinks-PvdA, D66, SP, Party for the Animals and think call it unbelievable that fvd and PVV are also under the statement. Member of Parliament Jan Paternotte of D66 Things That Way Conspiracy Theories of Gideon van Meijeren (FvD) That the Extreme Left-Wing Antifa and the Police would have provoked the Violence, Are Whitewashed. Earlier Statements by PVV Leader Geert Wilders About Not Accepting Democratic Decisions are also a reason not to sign.
GroenLinks-Pvda Joins the Words of Paternotte and Calls It Unbelievable. “After years of inciting and setting up Groups of People, it is not enough to condemn far-right political political violence. Then the distribution of the ideas that lead to the violence must be stopped.”
A Question of Confidence is hanging in the air for pvdd the news that the minister initially did not follow the advice of the nctv, causes annoyance to several parties.
“Question of Confidence is on the table,” Said PvdD Leader Esther Ouwehand on x Yesterday. Think Leader Stephan van Baarle Thinks It is “Unsuitable and Unworthy of the Position of Minister” If you “Knowingly and Deliberately Keep Silent About Nazis and Far-Right Thugs”.
If a motion of no confidence is to follow, the chans is still small that it will get a majority.
NCTV had advised to immedialy label riots as ‘far right’ the initial cautious minister of Oosten had recedived advice from the nctv not only to speak “rioters, thugs or hooligans, without mentioning the underlying right-wing extremist ideas”.
Otherwise, no “complete picture of reality” would be sketched and right-wing extremist ideas would be therefore not be problematized, “but even further normalized”, can be read in the advice published on Wednesday Evening.
The Hague Did not Expect Massive Riots with ‘Extreme Violence’ at Demonstration The Municipality of the Hague Did Not Expect That The Demonstration Against The Asylum Policy On The Malieveld on Saturday would result in Violence, Riots and Destruction. However